The Challenge: Preventing AI Hallucination and Taming Graph Entropy
Generic AI summarizers notoriously distort debate nuances: they fabricate non-existent quotes, smooth over genuine disagreements, or misattribute arguments to the wrong speaker. Meanwhile, rendering real debates with branching rebuttals, concessions, and joint-support junctions quickly becomes an unreadable tangle of visual chaos.
The engineering mandate demanded absolute citation integrity, sub-50ms local responsiveness, and an intuitive canvas capable of organizing up to 160 intricate argument nodes without freezing the browser.
- Guaranteeing that every single extracted quotation is strictly grounded in exact, verifiable character offsets of the source transcript.
- Architecting an automated ELK layout engine that automatically handles circular reasoning, shared evidence, and multi-premise junctions.
- Eliminating model bias by evaluating exchanges across three orthogonal criteria: formal logic, evidence strength, and conversational responsiveness.



